Issue 2026-09 · 18 tools · 22 head-to-heads · 13 model profiles

Every AI drama tool,
on one rubric

18 AI short-drama, novel-to-video and video tools from China and the West on one scorecard — parsing, consistency, storyboard, video, audio, compositing, cost — verified against official pages and re-checked monthly.

At a glance

Mean score

Top 10 · mean of 7 criteria scored 1–5 · Higher is better
  1. 1SceneMixer4.6
  2. 2LTX Studio6/7 scored3.8
  3. 3LibTV6/7 scored3.7
  4. 4Xiaoyunque6/7 scored3.7
  5. 5Hailuo (MiniMax)3.3
  6. 6Veo / Flow (Google)3.1
  7. 7invideo AI3.1
  8. 8Morph Studio3.1
  9. 9Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)2.9
  10. 10CapCut2.9
012345

Price per second

6 publish a convertible per-second price · Lower is better
  1. PixVerse V6API list price$0.08
  2. Hailuo (MiniMax)platform price$0.08–$0.13
  3. MiniMax Hailuo H3API list price$0.08–$0.13
  4. Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)platform price$0.09–$0.17
  5. SceneMixerplatform price$0.20–$0.50
  6. Veo 3.1API list price$0.35–$0.75
00.250.50.751
Solid range = published low-to-high tier price per second ($); shorter is cheaper. No convertible per-second price published: LibTV, Xiaoyunque, Dreamina (Jimeng), Kling AI, Vidu, PixVerse, CapCut, LTX Studio, Runway, Pika, Luma Dream Machine, Sora (OpenAI), Veo / Flow (Google), invideo AI, Morph Studio.

Overall scores

Mean of the scored criteria, with an n/7 badge. It answers which tool is more complete overall — not which clip looks best.

Mean of scored criteria

18 tools · 7 criteria scored 1–5 · editorial ratings, not measurements · Higher is better
18 tools · verified 2026-09-02How we score ↗
Not scored — insufficient evidence (not counted as 0, excluded from the mean)
  1. 1SceneMixer4.6
  2. 2LTX Studio6/7 scored3.8
  3. 3LibTV6/7 scored3.7
  4. 4Xiaoyunque6/7 scored3.7
  5. 5Hailuo (MiniMax)3.3
  6. 6Veo / Flow (Google)3.1
  7. 7invideo AI3.1
  8. 8Morph Studio3.1
  9. 9Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)2.9
  10. 10CapCut2.9
  11. 11Sora (OpenAI)6/7 scored2.8
  12. 12Kling AI2.7
  13. 13PixVerse2.7
  14. 14Dreamina (Jimeng)2.6
  15. 15Runway2.6
  16. 16Vidu2.4
  17. 17Luma Dream Machine2.4
  18. 18Pika2.0
012345
Mean of scored criteria

Mean of the scored criteria (each 1–5, one decimal). Criteria without enough evidence are not scored and not counted; the 'n/7 scored' badge says how many went in. It is an editorial rating, not a measurement: one point on one criterion moves the mean by 0.14.

By criterion

Scores are ordinal: ties sit side by side rather than being ranked. Each level shows the rubric anchor, so the gap between a 5 and a 3 is explicit.

Script & novel parsing

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5Whole novel auto-split; reproducible appearance; scenes, props, hooksSceneMixer
  2. 4Between anchorsLibTVXiaoyunque
  3. 3Script → storyboard, no splittingLTX Studioinvideo AI
  4. 2Between anchorsMorph Studio
  5. 1No parsing; single promptsDreamina (Jimeng)Kling AIHailuo (MiniMax)Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)ViduPixVerseCapCutRunwayPikaLuma Dream MachineSora (OpenAI)Veo / Flow (Google)
18 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Script & novel parsing

5 = Whole novel auto-split; reproducible appearance; scenes, props, hooks; 3 = Script → storyboard, no splitting; 1 = No parsing; single prompts.

Character consistency

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5Cast library + references injected per segment + continuity rulesSceneMixer
  2. 4Between anchorsKling AIHailuo (MiniMax)ViduLTX Studio
  3. 3Reference images / multi-subject reference, manualLibTVXiaoyunqueDreamina (Jimeng)Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)PixVerseRunwayLuma Dream MachineVeo / Flow (Google)Morph Studio
  4. 2Between anchorsPikaSora (OpenAI)invideo AI
  5. 1No reference mechanismCapCut
18 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Character consistency

5 = Cast library + references injected per segment + continuity rules; 3 = Reference images / multi-subject reference, manual; 1 = No reference mechanism.

Storyboard & shot control

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5Auto storyboard, per-shot editing, timing and cut controlSceneMixerLTX Studio
  2. 4Between anchorsLibTVMorph Studio
  3. 3Canvas / manual arrangementXiaoyunqueHailuo (MiniMax)Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)PixVerseSora (OpenAI)Veo / Flow (Google)
  4. 2Between anchorsDreamina (Jimeng)Kling AIViduCapCutRunwayLuma Dream Machineinvideo AI
  5. 1No storyboard layerPika
18 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Storyboard & shot control

5 = Auto storyboard, per-shot editing, timing and cut control; 3 = Canvas / manual arrangement; 1 = No storyboard layer.

Video generation quality

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5Frontier model; stable motion, physics, facesKling AIHailuo (MiniMax)RunwayLuma Dream MachineSora (OpenAI)Veo / Flow (Google)
  2. 4Between anchorsSceneMixerLibTVXiaoyunqueDreamina (Jimeng)Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)ViduPixVerseLTX StudioMorph Studio
  3. 3Usable with occasional artifactsCapCutPikainvideo AI
  4. 2Between anchors
  5. 1Clearly behind
18 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Video generation quality

5 = Frontier model; stable motion, physics, faces; 3 = Usable with occasional artifacts; 1 = Clearly behind.

Voice & audio

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5Controllable character voices with correct lip-sync attributionHailuo (MiniMax)Veo / Flow (Google)
  2. 4Between anchorsSceneMixerXiaoyunqueWan (Tongyi Wanxiang)CapCutSora (OpenAI)invideo AI
  3. 3Native audio, not controllableDreamina (Jimeng)Kling AIPixVerseLTX StudioRunwayLuma Dream Machine
  4. 2Between anchorsViduPikaMorph Studio
  5. 1No audio
  6. Not scored — insufficient evidenceLibTV
17 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Voice & audio

5 = Controllable character voices with correct lip-sync attribution; 3 = Native audio, not controllable; 1 = No audio.

Episode compositing

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5One-click episode assemblySceneMixerCapCutinvideo AI
  2. 4Between anchorsLibTVXiaoyunqueLTX Studio
  3. 3Timeline / canvas chainingVeo / Flow (Google)Morph Studio
  4. 2Between anchorsDreamina (Jimeng)PixVerseRunwaySora (OpenAI)
  5. 1Export segments, assemble by handKling AIHailuo (MiniMax)Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)ViduPikaLuma Dream Machine
18 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Episode compositing

5 = One-click episode assembly; 3 = Timeline / canvas chaining; 1 = Export segments, assemble by hand.

Cost & free tier

Tools grouped by their 1–5 score, ties side by side; each level shows the rubric anchor
  1. 5Low per-second price with a usable free tier
  2. 4Between anchorsSceneMixerHailuo (MiniMax)Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)CapCutPikaMorph Studio
  3. 3Mid-rangeLibTVDreamina (Jimeng)Kling AIViduPixVerseinvideo AI
  4. 2Between anchorsRunwayLuma Dream MachineVeo / Flow (Google)
  5. 1Expensive or no free tier
  6. Not scored — insufficient evidenceXiaoyunqueLTX StudioSora (OpenAI)
15 of 18 scored · ties are listed together, not ranked
Cost & free tier

5 = Low per-second price with a usable free tier; 3 = Mid-range; 1 = Expensive or no free tier.

Positioning

Decide first whether you need a pipeline or a video engine — that is the first fork in the road.

Positioning: stage coverage × engine strength

x counts how many of six stages run without manual work; y is how good each generated segment is; color = category
Pipeline (parse → composite)Video engine / platformEditor / finishingOther
Positioning map of AI short-drama tools18 tools plotted by stage coverage and engine strength.012345612345Stage coverage (0–6; a criterion ≥ 3 counts)Engine strength (mean of video + audio, 1–5)SceneMixer: 6.0, 4.0Xiaoyunque: 6.0, 4.0LibTV: 5.0, 4.0CapCut: 3.0, 3.5Dreamina (Jimeng): 3.0, 3.5Kling AI: 3.0, 4.0Luma Dream Machine: 3.0, 4.0Runway: 3.0, 4.0Hailuo (MiniMax): 4.0, 5.0Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang): 4.0, 4.0Vidu: 2.0, 3.0PixVerse: 4.0, 3.5invideo AI: 4.0, 3.5LTX Studio: 6.0, 3.5Pika: 1.0, 2.5Sora (OpenAI): 3.0, 4.5Veo / Flow (Google): 5.0, 5.0Morph Studio: 4.0, 3.0PikaViduMorph StudioCapCutDreamina (Jimeng)PixVerseinvideo AILTX StudioKling AILuma Dream MachineRunwayLibTVSceneMixerXiaoyunqueSora (OpenAI)Hailuo (MiniMax)Veo / Flow (Google)
  1. 1SceneMixer 6.0 / 4.0
  2. 2LibTV 5.0 / 4.0
  3. 3Xiaoyunque 6.0 / 4.0
  4. 4Dreamina (Jimeng) 3.0 / 3.5
  5. 5Kling AI 3.0 / 4.0
  6. 6Hailuo (MiniMax) 4.0 / 5.0
  7. 7Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang) 4.0 / 4.0
  8. 8Vidu 2.0 / 3.0
  9. 9PixVerse 4.0 / 3.5
  10. 10CapCut 3.0 / 3.5
  11. 11LTX Studio 6.0 / 3.5
  12. 12Runway 3.0 / 4.0
  13. 13Pika 1.0 / 2.5
  14. 14Luma Dream Machine 3.0 / 4.0
  15. 15Sora (OpenAI) 3.0 / 4.5
  16. 16Veo / Flow (Google) 5.0 / 5.0
  17. 17invideo AI 4.0 / 3.5
  18. 18Morph Studio 4.0 / 3.0
ToolStage coverage (0–6; a criterion ≥ 3 counts)Engine strength (mean of video + audio, 1–5)
SceneMixer6.04.0
LibTV5.04.0
Xiaoyunque6.04.0
Dreamina (Jimeng)3.03.5
Kling AI3.04.0
Hailuo (MiniMax)4.05.0
Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)4.04.0
Vidu2.03.0
PixVerse4.03.5
CapCut3.03.5
LTX Studio6.03.5
Runway3.04.0
Pika1.02.5
Luma Dream Machine3.04.0
Sora (OpenAI)3.04.5
Veo / Flow (Google)5.05.0
invideo AI4.03.5
Morph Studio4.03.0
Tools to the right deliver a series; tools toward the top deliver the best single segment. Points sharing a coordinate are nudged sideways; the offset is not data. · Also plotted: Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)
How the two axes are computed

Stage coverage: of six production stages (parsing, reference art/consistency, storyboard, video, audio, compositing), a stage counts as covered when its criterion scores ≥ 3. Measures how much of book → series the tool does without manual work. Engine strength: mean of video quality and voice & audio — how good each generated segment is.

Scoreboard

All tools →

Integer scores on 7 criteria plus the mean; open a tool for the basis of each score.

#ToolParsingConsistencyStoryboardVideoAudioCompositingCostMean
1SceneMixerEnd-to-end AI short-drama pipeline55544544.6/5
2LTX StudioAI narrative production workstation3454343.8/56/7 scored
3LibTVEnd-to-end AI short drama (node canvas)4344433.7/56/7 scored
4XiaoyunqueEnd-to-end AI short drama (agent)4334443.7/56/7 scored
5Hailuo (MiniMax)Video generation model / creation platform14355143.3/5
6Veo / Flow (Google)Video generation model / creation tool13355323.1/5
7invideo AIAI finished-video tool (marketing / explainer)32234533.1/5
8Morph StudioAI short-film workstation23442343.1/5
9Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)Video generation model / creation platform13344142.9/5
10CapCutEditing + AI generation11234542.9/5
11Sora (OpenAI)Video generation model / app1235422.8/56/7 scored
12Kling AIVideo generation model / creation platform14253132.7/5
13PixVerseVideo generation model / creation platform13343232.7/5
14Dreamina (Jimeng)Video generation model / creation platform13243232.6/5
15RunwayVideo generation model / creation platform13253222.6/5
16ViduVideo generation model / creation platform14242132.4/5
17Luma Dream MachineVideo generation model / creation platform13253122.4/5
18PikaVideo generation model / creation platform12132142.0/5

22 pairs: one fact table, one rubric, “pick A if…”.

Model profiles

All models →

The models under the platforms: seconds per generation, references, audio, list prices.

Video models: seconds per generation

9 of 10 video models publish a segment length · one segment = one call; its length caps the cuts per segment
10 video modelsHow we score ↗
Solid = published min–max seconds per generation; ↑ = extendable. Not disclosed: LTX-2.

Published per-second prices (platform prices + API list prices)

Only prices verifiable on official pages are drawn; undisclosed ones are named in the caption, never drawn as 0
6 verifiable pricesHow we score ↗
  1. PixVerse V6API list price$0.08
  2. Hailuo (MiniMax)platform price$0.08–$0.13
  3. MiniMax Hailuo H3API list price$0.08–$0.13
  4. Wan (Tongyi Wanxiang)platform price$0.09–$0.17
  5. SceneMixerplatform price$0.20–$0.50
  6. Veo 3.1API list price$0.35–$0.75
00.250.50.751
Solid range = published low-to-high tier price per second ($); shorter is cheaper. No convertible per-second price published: LibTV, Xiaoyunque, Dreamina (Jimeng), Kling AI, Vidu, PixVerse, CapCut, LTX Studio, Runway, Pika, Luma Dream Machine, Sora (OpenAI), Veo / Flow (Google), invideo AI, Morph Studio.

Understand first: what AI short drama is, how it is made, what it costs, how to stay compliant.

Guides

All 9 →

Do it: workflow, cost breakdown, storyboard template, localization, monetization.

FAQ

What is the difference between an AI short-drama tool and an AI video generator?

A video generator (Kling, Hailuo, Runway, Pika, Luma, Veo, Sora) produces one 4–15-second clip per call; an AI short-drama tool (SceneMixer, LTX Studio, LibTV, Xiaoyunque) adds parsing and episode splitting, a cast library, storyboard scripts and episode compositing — it outputs a series, not a clip.

How are the scores produced?

Seven criteria scored 1–5 each: parsing, consistency, storyboard control, video quality, audio, compositing, cost — from official documentation and hands-on testing; criteria with insufficient information are left unscored. Full rubric on the methodology page.

What is this site's relationship with the tools it reviews?

None: SinCoSphere is independently operated and accepts no paid placements. Every tool is scored on the same published rubric, facts are limited to official public information with a last-checked date, and corrections are welcome.

What does one episode of AI short drama cost?

At September-2026 list prices, a 90-second episode runs roughly $6–11 at 720p and $13–23 at 1080p including 30–50% regeneration headroom. See the cost breakdown.

Official facts onlyEvery fact carries a source URL and a last-checked date; undisclosed stays undisclosed
One rubric7 criteria, 1–5; every tool on the same table, basis written on each tool page
No absolute verdictsComparisons say 'pick A if…'; rankings state their method
Corrections in 72 hPublished editorial policy with a corrections log