Home › Tools › Wan

Wan Review (2026): Features, Pricing, Pros & Cons

Alibaba's image and video platform; Wan 3.0 supports 30 s segments, native audio and reference media, billed per second via API.

Facts come from official pages with a last-checked date; scores follow our published 7-criterion rubric and are left blank when evidence is insufficient. No ads, no paid placements — editorial policy & corrections.
Mean of scored criteria2.9/5#=25 of 36 this issue · 4 of 6 stagesOfficial site ↗

Wan spans text/image-to-image, text/image-to-video and image editing, with an international site at wan.video. The Wan 3.0 video model generates 2–30 s per segment with native dialogue, sound effects and music, takes up to 10 reference images, 5 reference videos and 5 reference audio clips, and documents a timestamped multi-shot storyboard format (4–6 s per shot). The API price list charges per second of output: $0.05 / $0.10 / $0.20 at 480P / 720P / 1080P in Singapore. No novel parsing or episode compositing.

Pros

  • 30 s segments; the price list charges output seconds only, with no separate line for reference inputs
  • Native audio
  • Images and video on one platform with a mature API

Cons

  • No parsing, splitting or compositing
  • Strict content moderation (gore terms rejected)
  • Follows its own prompt conventions for silence/speech control

Against the field

Wan against the field

One 1–5 axis per criterion; the other 35 tools on this site cluster into grey bubbles
36 tools · verified 2026-09-12How we score ↗
  1. Script & novel parsingsame as 13 others13513221
  2. Character consistencysame as 13 others12131533
  3. Storyboard & shot controlsame as 12 others2412843
  4. Video generation qualitysame as 10 others310164
  5. Voice & audiosame as 10 others2141064
  6. Episode compositingsame as 7 others756871
  7. Cost & free tiersame as 12 others6141214
12345
Solid dot = Wan; the number in each grey bubble is how many other tools on this site sit at that score.

Coverage of the six stages

Stage coverage: of six production stages (parsing, reference art/consistency, storyboard, video, audio, compositing), a stage counts as covered when its criterion scores ≥ 3. Measures how much of book → series the tool does without manual work.
■ criterion scored ≥ 3 · □ below 3 · dashed = not scored

Published per-second prices

Wan's tier range against other verifiable prices on this site
17 verifiable pricesHow we score ↗
  1. Viduplatform price$0.04–$0.07
  2. Runwayplatform price$0.12
  3. Runway Gen-4.5 / AlephAPI list price$0.12
  4. ViduAPI list price$0.04–$0.12
  5. Hailuo (MiniMax)platform price$0.08–$0.13
  6. MiniMax Hailuo H3API list price$0.08–$0.13
  7. Kling AIplatform price$0.08–$0.17
  8. Wanplatform price$0.10–$0.20
  9. Wan 3.0 / 3.0 PrimeAPI list price$0.05–$0.20
  10. PixVerse V6API list price$0.09–$0.23
  11. LTX Studioplatform price$0.09–$0.39
  12. LTX-2.5API list price$0.09–$0.39
  13. Kling 3.0 / OmniAPI list price$0.08–$0.42
  14. SceneMixerplatform price$0.06–$0.47
  15. Veo / Flow (Google)platform price$0.05–$0.60
  16. Veo 3.1API list price$0.05–$0.60
  17. SoraAPI list price$0.10–$0.70
00.250.50.751
Solid range = published low-to-high tier price per second ($); shorter is cheaper. No convertible per-second price published: Dreamina, PixVerse, CapCut, Pika, Luma Dream Machine, Sora (OpenAI), invideo AI, Morph Studio, SkyReels, PopShort AI, Scenes AI, Showrunner Studio, Pixmax, OnSolo, Frameo.AI, Katalist, M Studio, Storyboarder.ai, ScreenWeaver, Melies, Elser AI, AutoWeeb, Argil, Higgsfield, Topview, MagicLight, OpenArt, Mootion.

Features & pricing

Core features

  • Text/image-to-video, 2–30 s per segment
  • Reference image, video and audio inputs
  • Text/image-to-image and editing
  • API via Alibaba Model Studio
  • Async tasks; prompt rewriting is on by default and can be disabled

Pricing

Free tier
New-user free quota (per site)
Starting price
International API (Singapore) $0.05/s (480p), $0.10/s (720p), $0.20/s (1080p); $0.041 / $0.083 / $0.165 in Tokyo, Frankfurt, Virginia and Hong Kong; consumer plans per site
Billing
API per second; consumer membership/credits
Platforms
Web, API

Prime tier matches standard quality at higher speed. Series estimate →

Scores and basis

Methodology →

Scored 1–5 per criterion on our published methodology from official documentation and vendor pages; criteria without enough information are left unscored.

CriterionScoreBasis
Script & novel parsing1No parsing; single prompts
Character consistency3Reference images / multi-subject reference, manual
Storyboard & shot control3Canvas / manual arrangement
Video generation quality4
Voice & audio4
Episode compositing1Export segments, assemble by hand
Cost & free tier4

Best for

Long, low-cost segments with many references; as an alternate engine inside a pipeline.

Models under the hood

Compare with alternatives

All alternatives →

FAQ

Is Wan free?

New-user free quota (per site) International API (Singapore) $0.05/s (480p), $0.10/s (720p), $0.20/s (1080p); $0.041 / $0.083 / $0.165 in Tokyo, Frankfurt, Virginia and Hong Kong; consumer plans per site

Can Wan turn a novel into a short drama?

No Consistency: Up to 10 reference images, 5 reference videos, 5 reference audio clips

Who is Wan for?

Long, low-cost segments with many references; as an alternate engine inside a pipeline.

What are the alternatives to Wan?

See the Wan alternatives page — every option on the same rubric with the criteria where it is stronger.

Sources

Official pages opened while writing; current pricing and features are always as shown on the vendor site.

SinCoSphere Editorial

We review AI short-drama and video tools on a published rubric: facts from official pages with last-checked dates, seven criteria scored 1–5, unscored when evidence is thin, corrections within 72 hours. No ads, no paid placements.