Home › Methodology: how the seven criteria are scored

Methodology: how the seven criteria are scored

We score the ability to deliver a vertical short-drama series, not the look of a single clip. Seven criteria, 1–5 each, averaged into an overall score; any criterion without enough information is left blank (shown as —) rather than guessed.

Criterion531
Script & novel parsingWhole novel auto-split; reproducible appearance; scenes, props, hooksScript → storyboard, no splittingNo parsing; single prompts
Character consistencyCast library + references injected per segment + continuity rulesReference images / multi-subject reference, manualNo reference mechanism
Storyboard & shot controlAuto storyboard, per-shot editing, timing and cut controlCanvas / manual arrangementNo storyboard layer
Video generation qualityFrontier model; stable motion, physics, facesUsable with occasional artifactsClearly behind
Voice & audioControllable character voices with correct lip-sync attributionNative audio, not controllableNo audio
Episode compositingOne-click episode assemblyTimeline / canvas chainingExport segments, assemble by hand
Cost & free tierLow per-second price with a usable free tierMid-rangeExpensive or no free tier

Derived figures: stage coverage and engine strength

Stage coverage: of six production stages (parsing, reference art/consistency, storyboard, video, audio, compositing), a stage counts as covered when its criterion scores 3 or higher, giving 0–6. It measures how much of book → series a tool does without manual work; it is a mechanical roll-up of the scores, not a new judgment. Engine strength: the mean of video generation quality and voice & audio — how good each generated segment is. The positioning map on the home page uses exactly these two figures; every mean carries an "n/7 scored" badge and unscored criteria are excluded.

Sources

Facts come only from official pages (URLs and last-checked dates are listed at the end of every tool page). The basis for each score is written in the tool page's "Basis" column and open to challenge.

What we don't do

  • No second-hand prices, no invented numbers for undisclosed facts.
  • No absolute "X is better" verdicts: comparison pages say "pick A if… / pick B if…".
  • No reviews of products in closed beta without a public entry point.